You don’t need a platform or a committee to get value from AI. You need one tiny, boring‑but‑useful job, a safe way to run it, and a big red “off” switch.
This post gives you a practical, copy‑paste path to land one small, low‑risk AI helper—the kind that makes a visible difference without rewriting your stack.
What “smallest useful” looks like
- Narrow: Clear input → clear output (text in, text out).
- Observable: You can tell if it did the right thing in under a minute.
- Reversible: A kill switch puts the system back to how it worked yesterday.
- Privacy‑sane: No sensitive data leaves your house unless you’re comfortable with it.
Think assist not “autopilot.” You still decide; the AI drafts, suggests, or sorts.
Pick exactly one of these starter jobs
Choose the one that fits your world today. Each is text‑only, measurable, and safe to trial.
- Blog SEO helper (great for WordPress)\ Input: a published post. Output: a 150‑character meta description, 3 alt‑text lines, 5 tags.\ Visible win: better snippets in search and consistent alt‑text.
- Support inbox triage\ Input: new email or contact form text. Output: category + urgency (Low/Med/High) + two‑sentence summary.\ Visible win: faster routing, fewer “who owns this?” threads.
- Meeting note condenser\ Input: a raw note file or transcript. Output: 5 bullets + 3 concrete follow‑ups (no names, no sensitive data).\ Visible win: stakeholders can read the whole meeting in 30 seconds.
- Code review checklist generator\ Input: PR title + diff summary. Output: a checklist (security, tests, docs, perf) matched to the change.\ Visible win: more consistent reviews in less time.
- Log anomaly explainer\ Input: a log excerpt or error text (sanitized). Output: “what it likely means” + “first thing to try.”\ Visible win: quicker first response without paging the on‑call at 2 a.m.
Pick one. If you’re torn, do #1 or #2—they show value in under an hour and avoid sensitive data if you do it right.
Guardrails before you touch a line of code
- Data diet: Don’t send secrets, PII, payment data, private customer text, or internal tokens.
- Scope: Plain text only. Cap length (e.g., first 5,000 characters).
- Timeout & retries: 10–20s timeout; max one retry; graceful fallback.
- Output shape: Demand strict JSON or fixed bullets you can validate.
- Logging: Keep inputs & outputs (sanitized) for spot checks; store for a short, clear period.
- Kill switch: A feature flag (
AI_ENABLED=false) that instantly returns the old behavior. - Attribution: If the draft is public‑facing (e.g., meta descriptions), you’re the editor. Never ship raw model output without a skim.
Monday plan: land one helper in ~9 steps
- Choose the job (#1–#5 above).
- Define the acceptance (1–2 sentences). Example: > “Given a blog post, produce a 140–160 character meta description, 3 alt‑text lines ≤125 chars, and 5 tags. No emojis, no hashtags.”
- Pick a provider you already have (Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Claude, or a local model via Ollama). Use whatever your org allows.
- Write a compact prompt (see examples below).
- Force a schema: ask for JSON with exact keys and lengths; reject otherwise.
- **Wire the feature flag (kill switch):
AI_ENABLEDenv var or a WP option toggle. - Add a tiny UI affordance (checkbox “Use AI draft”). Default off for the first week.
- Log 20 runs and manually score correctness (Pass / Needs edit / Wrong).
- Decide: keep, tweak, or kill. If you keep it, roll from 10% → 100% of eligible cases.
Ready‑to‑use prompts (copy/paste)
A) Blog SEO helper (post → meta + alt‑text + tags)
System / instruction prompt:
You write succinct, literal meta descriptions and image alt-text.
Never invent facts not present in the input.
Respect the constraints exactly.
Return ONLY valid minified JSON.
User prompt:
INPUT:
<POST_TITLE>{{title}}</POST_TITLE>
<POST_URL>{{url}}</POST_URL>
<POST_BODY>{{first_5000_chars_of_html_stripped}}</POST_BODY>
TASKS:
1) Meta description: 140–160 chars. No quotes. Plain sentence. No emojis.
2) Alt text: 3 lines, ≤125 chars each, describing likely header/hero image content in neutral language. Do not mention “image of”.
3) Tags: 5 short tags (lowercase, hyphenated), based on the content.
OUTPUT JSON SCHEMA:
{
"meta_description": "string (140-160 chars)",
"alt_text": ["string<=125","string<=125","string<=125"],
"tags": ["kebab-case","kebab-case","kebab-case","kebab-case","kebab-case"]
}
B) Support inbox triage (email → category + urgency + summary)
System / instruction prompt:
You classify support emails conservatively. Do not guess beyond the text.
Output strict JSON only.
User prompt:
EMAIL:
{{sanitized_email_body}}
CATEGORIES: ["billing","bug","how-to","feedback","sales","other"]
URGENCY: ["low","medium","high"]
Return:
{
"category": "<one of CATEGORIES>",
"urgency": "<one of URGENCY>",
"summary": "<2 concise sentences, no names, no ticket numbers>"
}
Validation & safety snippets
Regex check for JSON keys (conceptual; use your language’s JSON schema/checker):
function isValidOutput(obj){
if(!obj) return false;
if(typeof obj.metadescription === 'string' && obj.metadescription.length>=140 && obj.metadescription.length<=160
&& Array.isArray(obj.alttext) && obj.alttext.length===3 && obj.alttext.every(s=>s.length<=125)
&& Array.isArray(obj.tags) && obj.tags.length===5 && obj.tags.every(t=>/^[a-z0-9]+(-[a-z0-9]+)*$/.test(t))) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
PII guard (very simple example)—redact emails/phones before send:
function sanitize(text){
return text
.replace(/[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,}/gi, "[redacted-email]")
.replace(/\+?\d[\d\s().-]{7,}\d/g, "[redacted-phone]");
}
Kill switch pattern:
const AIENABLED = process.env.AIENABLED === 'true';
async function getSeoDraft(post){
if(!AI_ENABLED) return legacySeo(post); // immediate fallback
const input = sanitize(extractText(post));
const ai = await callModel(input);
return isValidOutput(ai) ? ai : legacySeo(post);
}
(Translate to PHP, Python, or whatever your site uses; the pattern is what matters.)
How to judge success (fast and honest)
Create a tiny sheet with 20 rows and score each run:
- Pass (shippable as‑is)
- Edit (one quick fix)
- Wrong (not usable)
Keep two numbers: Pass+Edit % and editor time saved (gut‑check minutes is fine the first week). If Pass+Edit ≥ 80% and you feel the time win, keep it. If not, fix the prompt or kill it (flag off) and try another job.
Rollout slices that won’t bite you
- Week 1 → Opt‑in (checkbox, 10% of cases)
- Week 2 → Default‑on (user can turn off per item)
- Week 3 → Background suggest (auto‑draft that you can accept/edit)
At any time, flip AI_ENABLED=false. No drama, no outages, no regrets.
Troubleshooting: common misses and quick fixes
- Output is verbose or drifts off topic → tighten the task list and add length limits; require JSON.
- Model invents details → add “Never invent facts not in input” to the instruction; reduce temperature.
- Alt‑text sounds like marketing copy → say “neutral, literal description; no brand words.”
- Tags are too generic → add 2–3 example tags you like; forbid generic words (“tech”, “news”).
- Latency hurts UX → use a background draft pattern; show a spinner only if the draft arrives within 1–2 seconds; otherwise show the legacy UI and let the draft appear later.
- Costs creep → cap tokens/characters up front; batch calls; cache outputs on a content hash.
Run this now (checklist)
- [ ] Choose one job (start with Blog SEO helper).
- [ ] Write the 1–2 sentence acceptance description.
- [ ] Add the feature flag (
AI_ENABLED=falseto start). - [ ] Paste the prompt and wire a single API call (or local model).
- [ ] Enforce JSON shape; add sanitizer and fallback.
- [ ] Test on 5 real items; log inputs/outputs (sanitized).
- [ ] Turn on for you only; collect 20 runs; score Pass/Edit/Wrong.
- [ ] Keep if ≥80% usable and you feel faster; otherwise, kill and try the next job.
If you want, I can tailor the Blog SEO helper specifically for your WordPress setup—down to a tiny PHP function that pulls the post, strips HTML, calls your chosen model, validates output, and writes the meta fields. Do you want it as PHP for a custom plugin or JS via a headless endpoint?


Leave a Reply